Chevy Trailblazer SS Forum banner

Stealth Cam results on M112 Magnacharger!!

4 reading
8.3K views 62 replies 23 participants last post by  mike mcginnis  
#1 · (Edited)
This is absolutely one of my favorite cams that we have come up with. The cam made an additional 34rwhp in my own truck with stock manifolds/y-pipe/cats. Well we were fortunate recently to have Mikes truck at the shop to get a Maggie M112 and a cam installed. To see the results we first dyno tuned it on the blower, then installed the cam and dyno tuned it again.

Boy where the results impressive



52+ RWHP
34+ RWTQ



Image
 
#9 ·
GREAT NUMBERS!!! What are the IATs running? How much boost? How much timing are you running? Would you expect the same gains on my setup? That would put me at 530 and 500.
 
#11 ·
The 2.7 is a little small for a street daily driver. It is more the added stress on the belt then the ability to run a little more boost. Each .1" change in pulley diameter is about 1 psi of boost change. I know of several on the board that run a 2.7 pulley on an MP112, just watch for belt slip and tune for it.
 
#15 ·
This is killing me. Why do I look at this section, I'm not going to change internals.

I'm not going to change internals.

I'm not going to change internals...
 
#40 ·
Put the supercharger on first...then you can always change internals later!

LOL


Alvin, is this cam going to end up a big competitor to the LPE GT2-3?

I am considering both cams, your low lift STEALTH and GT2-3.

Both allow for growth it seems!! (stock manifolds...then headers...etc; instead of having headers right away w/ the attitude)

How will this cam function with a daily driver (high mileage => over 24k miles per year) (I'm curious about spring longevity)

Thanks and GREAT work!

-Mike
 
#20 ·
Nice gains Alvin!
 
#22 ·
Alvin, did you by chance notice what the boost level was at WOT with the stock cam and then with the stealth cam ? if so what was the difference ?
 
#24 ·
The surface area on the pulley that the belt contacts is the issue with the smaller pulley's. If you can get that belt on then it can be used. I have not tried that belt length with the system. It is worth a try. Just make sure the tensioner isn't completely bottomed out and tapping.

It is best to change the belt once a year or every 5000 or so miles. Just put the old used belt under the seat as a back-up. The reason to change so often is that the belt starts to get hard and glaze. They only cost between $30-$45 and you want to keep it running with the least amount of slip.
 
#43 ·
The surface area on the pulley that the belt contacts is the issue with the smaller pulley's. If you can get that belt on then it can be used. I have not tried that belt length with the system. It is worth a try. Just make sure the tensioner isn't completely bottomed out and tapping.
I did the math between the 3" pulley versus the 2.7", basing it on 55% contact area between the belt and pulley (estimated by looking at it on the truck). By switching to the 2.7 pulley, the total belt length difference is .738" shorter than the standard supercharger belt, so using the 105.75" belt should be just fine. I have one on order and should be in tomorrow, so I'll keep you posted. The belt I bought is the Goodyear Gatorback Poly V p/n GTR-4061058. Couldn't find the Dayco equivalent yet, but I'm still searching.
 
#26 ·
Taking Notes On The Cam For When I Get A Maggie. Thanks For All The Input Guys.
 
#33 ·
Yes, it made 429rwhp optimally tuned and had one 436 pull with more timing than I would typically leave in one. (I like to be safe with blower cars) So really the results should have been against 429rwhp instead of the 436. After the cam the most it made was 489rwhp with agressive timing and 488 with where I'd like to leave it.
 
#30 ·
alving just sent you a pm

122HH
trick flow 235 70cc
Meth injection

Will the high lift cam be good for me??

also what are the cam specs?
 
#31 ·
Just curious, would widening the lobe centers, perhaps delaying the intake, say 2 degrees, have a positive effect?

I imagine it might lose a bit of top end on a N/A motor, but under boost, perhaps help?

I have zero personal experience with power adders, but lots of curiosity.
 
#32 ·
This cam has negative overlap at .050. You will see a drop in boost just like if you used a less restrictive intercooler/aftercooler, better exhaust, etc. Boost is just a measure of back pressure.. if the engine is at a better VE you will see slightly less boost but with great gains still in power like we have here.